“Speaking only for myself, I'm 28, still less than halfway through my life expectancy, and I've no intention of booking a one-way to Switzerland just yet.
”
Good!!
Now, in the spirit of this section of the forum, as it states above
Ok, good old fashioned debate. Not for the faint hearted, but keep it non offensive, clean and tempers in check... I shall continue.
It's an interesting article and right to raise the concerns. However, it too chooses the statistics it uses to support it's view point. To be fair - the article does state...
“I can selectively quote statistics, too, it would seem.”
We all know that statistics can be used to make a specific point and often the same statistic can be used to prove 2 different points depending on how it is used. I would assume most people would agree with the next two statements:-
Is it in the governments interest to make cuts that effect people with genuine claims? No.
Is it in the governments interest to make cuts that effect people with fraudulent claims? Yes.
The government needs to get a grips with the debt we're in otherwise it will just get worse and we don't want to be in a position to cutting benefits to those who need it most as the article states....
“The motivations for the coalition government to look at DLA are clear. In 2008/09, DWP spent