From a completely non legal layman perspective, and from someone that spends a lot of time working with local authority and non profit organisations, I'm for anything that breathes efficiency using technology and making services more accessible.
So on paper or as a headline it sounds great. I've no doubt there are a million and one legal implications and questions which will properly keep the next generation of legal brains in work for years ![]()
But from a technology point of view, large projects like this have a habit of being overly complex, poorly managed and unrealistically costed from the outset. This then leads to delayed launches, cost over runs, unresolved glitches due to increased pressure, and a negative image before it's even had a chance to bed in.
Any government project has the media breathing all over it every step of the way looking for anything that be squeezed into a headline or sensationalised from an out of context comment.
Hopefully this will be well thought through, planned and managed. Assuming the legal arguments can be resolved, I think it's an obvious evolution of the legal system and a welcome overhaul bringing it into the 21st century.
I'm not so sure of references and pundit claims comparing it to paypal or ebay disputes are going to carry much favour, personally that will do more harm than good.
What does anyone else think?
Do I get a job a Sun headline writer?
