Why can't SEO's be performance based? 8th January 2012 4:28 PM
“Would you pay the local builder for an extension, before he started? A deposit maybe but you certainly wouldn't pay the full wack upfront, in the hope that you get what you are expecting for your money. Because you know the builder is never going to be seen again. Why should a customer gamble his/her money on what may or may not be achieved 3 months down the line? Only to be told on poor results, that if they chuck another couple of grand at it, they might achieve better results in another couple of months... Also I don't understand why the costs would be more expensive if it was results based. Why should the customer take the risk of poor substandard seo work?”
For the builder I would use, yes, I would be happy to. They are not all cowboys and do a runner with your money you know. That said, I am referring to similar amounts paid. If someone wanted