Posts

My brother was doing this 40 years ago - he must of had a vision

Wonder if this will apply to everyone - according to the letter we had it does.

But what about the following?

Im having a chip repair chap out soon to my car - he actually wants paying by card instead of cash - apparently he has an attachment for his fone, until i see it i dont know much about it ... must ask him when he comes back ...

Oh dear - seems like Apple have a bug in its new map system with some Towns no longer showing up whilst others have mysteriously been renamed.

BBC News - New Apple maps app under fire from users

It would appear from the report that Apple have dropped Google Maps in favour of their own system which they in turn get data from Tom Tom, although Tom Tom are distancing themselves from the problem. Apparently you are forced to use this map system when updating to iOS6.

Be interesting to see how this develops & how quickly fixes are in place ....

So a serving female gunner has given birth in Afghanistan after it was revealed that she was unaware she was pregnant!

Full story - Servicewoman has Camp Bastion baby - UK News - MSN News UK

Wonder if she will follow celebrities and call it after the place he was born in.....

Thats my point partly though - yes they are photographed every second they are outside, and yes she decided to take that role on the moment she started a relationship with the Prince but they still deserve to have down time and have private time and we should grant them that - what right does that photographer have to use a long lens camera to snoop on that privacy?

Im not debating they are funded by tax payers, one could argue they bring in revenue to the Country but thats a whole different issue to that of Privacy Law

... and then the peace was shattered

Can i bring this back to my original point, perhaps i didnt make it clear -

Is it right that people make a living by snooping on people and taking photos with long range lens cameras? My point was invasion of privacy, which regardless of class, wealth, fame or anything else EVERYONE has a right to privacy.

I have no interest in Kate, any more than i did about Max Moseley doing things with alleged prostitutes 2 or 3 years ago, but it seems that if its alleged Public Interest the press seem to think its ok to print whatever they feel like and hide behind the "freedom of press" line.

We could go off at a tangent about the News of the World & the phone hacking scandal - where do you draw the line at a headline news story & how far should a reporter go to get that story?

As a serial complainer myself - i use this experience to handle any queries in my customer service role here.( i always look at things as to how i would want to be handled)

Give me some examples and i will gladly give some advice

I totally agree - stop printing the tabloid filth & you will stop the paparazzi in their tracks.

TBH i couldnt care less who sleeps with who & when they are drunk in the streets or caught wearing no knickers - used to buy a newspaper everyday until i realised i was helping to line the pockets of these idiots !

Great result & thanks for the update.

Maybe rather than blanking her that price hike with discount for advance payment might work?

Best of luck moving forward.